When Kim Il-Jong recently visited Moscow on a surreal train journey, he proudly informed Vladimir Putin he was travelling in the armoured train given to his father as a present by Stalin. As analysts of the regime agree, this merely illustrates the extraordinary, reverential detail with which Kim and his founding father Kim Il-Sung have maintained a complete Stalinist state into the 21st century: In both North Korea and Iraq, the absolute political control of a tiny oligarchy, the propaganda state, economic centralisation, the interlocking labyrinth of security forces, and the preposterous cult of personality are self-consciously Stalinist Stalin, like Saddam, survived in power because he so terrorised his people that however great his blunders, there was no opposition left alive.
This idea dates back centuries, at least to Immanuel Kant and other 18th-century Enlightenment thinkers. In recent decades it has constituted a major research agenda, competing with and arguably supplanting other research agendas such as neo-realism.
The democratic peace proposition has many possible empirical and theoretical forms. Notably, most although not all empirical research on the democratic peace has employed quantitative methods of analysis. On the theoretical side, there are many different accounts of the relationship between democracy and peace, with Democratic peace thesis focusing on domestic political institutions, domestic political norms, and constructed identities.
The democratic peace proposition is connected to many other propositions linking domestic politics and international relations, including that democracies are more likely to cooperate with each other, that democracies are more likely to win the wars they fight, that escalating military casualties degrade public support for war, that leaders initiate conflict to secure their domestic hold on power the diversionary hypothesisthat democracies fight shorter wars, that different kinds of democracies experience different kinds of conflict behavior, that different kinds of authoritarian systems experience different kinds of conflict behavior, and others.
The democratic peace also overlaps with related ideas such as the liberal peace and the commercial peace. General Overviews The democratic peace proposition has been lurking in Western thought for millennia, as Weart shows, but Kant provides its first modern formulation.
The idea that global democracy would provide a solid foundation for global peace was restated in by Woodrow Wilson as a justification for American entry into World War I and then as part of his vision for a new world order.
Modern political science first observed the dyadic democratic peace—that democracies tend not to fight each other—in the s. The observation enjoyed greater attention in the s in particular in two pathbreaking essays by Michael Doyle, reprinted in Doyle It received fuller theoretical and empirical attention in the s.
Other scholars sought to develop the theory and push forward more advanced research designs in works such as Russett ; Ray ; and Rousseau, et al. In the s, proponents of the democratic peace responded to their critics and embedded the democratic peace in a broader Kantian peace Russett and Oneal The End of History and the Last Man.
The definitive intellectual statement that Western values triumphed in the Cold War. Cambridge University Press, Presents a massive new data set on territorial conflicts.
Edited by Hans S. Originally published in Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition. University of South Carolina Press, Available online by subscription.
Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post—Cold War World.
Princeton University Press, Lays out the normative and institutional explanations of the democratic peace and presents a variety of different forms of rigorous evidence demonstrating the dyadic democratic peace, including sophisticated analysis of post conflict behavior.
Russett, Bruce, and John R. Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. Presented more sophisticated empirical tests, addressing many s theoretical and empirical critiques.
Yale University Press, Presents a narrative rather than statistical empirical tests. One main contribution is the analysis of democratic peace in pre-Napoleonic times, including ancient Greece and medieval Italy. Discusses the phenomena of democratic aggression and imperialism.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login. How to Subscribe Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions.
For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here.The Democratic Peace Theory Essay Sample.
Is the ‘Democratic Peace’ thesis a convincing theory, or a statistical artefact? The Democratic Peace theory states that democratic states are less likely to wage war against each other, and that shared democratic procedures and ideals are apt to lead to less conflict.
Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was a student activist movement in the United States that was one of the main representations of the New lausannecongress2018.com organization developed and expanded rapidly in the mids before dissolving at its last convention in The Democratic Nursing Organisation of South Africa (DENOSA) notes the Mid-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) delivered by Finance Minister Tito Mboweni, especially on the commitment to make available R million for the employment of health professionals, including the additional R million to procure urgently needed items such as beds in health facilities.
Full text video excerpt of Jesse Jackson Democratic National Convention Address. Democratic peace: Democratic peace, the proposition that democratic states never (or almost never) wage war on one another. The concept of democratic peace must be distinguished from the claim that democracies are in general more peaceful than nondemocratic countries.
Whereas the latter claim is controversial, the. WHY CAN'T DICTATORS ASPIRE TO BE LIKE MUSSOLINI?: A fascinating FT op-ed on what Kim Jong-Il and Saddam Hussein have in common: "On the 50th anniversary of his death, the two paramount threats to world peace today, Saddam Hussein and President Kim Il-Jong of North Korea, openly base themselves and their regimes on Stalin.